This past
weekend, my husband and I went to a party where we knew the hosts but almost no
one else. As we mingled and met people at the party, I was asked a few times
how many children we had and what their ages were.
“Two
boys and a girl,” I would answer. “Ten, seven and two.”
The
conversations rolled on, but I had a hard time getting past that simple
question.
Sometimes,
the five-year age gap between seven-year-old Liam and two-year-old Jamilet
looms large. We had two foster children in that gap before Jamilet joined our
family. One of the two, who I now refer to in print as simply “T” to protect
her privacy, was with us over a year. T is four years old now, and is back with
her biological father, who met the necessary conditions to regain custody of
his daughter.
T
is four. And part of me thinks she belongs in my gap.
How
old are your children?
Ten, seven,
four and two.
It looks
neater to me. It makes more sense. One baby every two or three years. Four all together.
I know the
five-year gap between Liam and Jamilet probably feels as big as it ever will.
Jamilet is still more baby than little girl, and Liam has just entered the
big-kid world of soccer practice and chapter books. Five years might as well be a generation when
it’s the difference between Teletubbies and Batman.
And that’s
where the four-year-old would come in. Four-year-old T would be able to go up
or down. She could kick the soccer ball around with Liam, and also be happy
playing blocks with Jamilet. She would bridge that gap. Jamilet is in a car
seat. Liam has graduated into the regular seat of the car. T would be in a
booster, right in the middle.
I realize
that with the ability to play up with Liam, or down, with Jamilet, T would also
bring more sibling conflict into the family. Able to play with either, she
would get into skirmishes with both. Even in my imagination, while the spacing
is perfect, the children are not.
Maybe what
also bothers me about that five-year gap is the lack of symmetry I sometimes
feel in the family. I have a partner in Bill. Jacob and Liam have each other.
And while, of course, Jamilet has all of us, she doesn’t have someone who lines
up with her. She’s the only one in our family with her own room. T could share her
room.
But T has
been gone over a year. There is no reason to think she’s coming back. Yet,
still she dances in my mind. Her giggle is what comes between Liam and Jamilet.
T left our family, and in her place we have a span of sixty months between our
second and third children. To me, that span will always be T’s place. A place
she is always welcome to come back to, should she ever need it. A place she
could reclaim in a heartbeat.
She lived
with us for over a year, and in that time, she made us a better family. She
expanded our notion of love — showing us how strangers become family. Her smile
was testament to the resiliency of the human spirit, even as her case notes
spoke to the fragility of family life. With limited details of her past, and
social service’s uncertain plan for her future, T forced us to live in the
present. She taught us that family is about who is here right now—not who was
here before and who might come later. Maybe most importantly, T taught us that
the hurt that comes after loving and then letting go is survivable. She helped
us learn that the pushes on the swing and the Frisbee tosses and the fuzzy
footed pajamas outweigh that very heavy moment of goodbye.
And because
of all these things, her echo remains. Part of T’s echo is a five-year gap that
shows that life is not always neat; not always symmetrical.
T’s echo is
a gap that makes me pause at a party when I’m asked a very simple question.
How many
children do you have?
No comments:
Post a Comment